|
|
|
Titles:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract:
The
main thrust of preparation for inclusion has been to prepare the general
education teacher as well as the student with exceptionalities for
this educational initiative. Students without disabilities are often
not the prevailing focus in these efforts. This model is an archetype
that enables peers to understand, accept, and care for their classmates
with exceptionalities. Students acquire knowledge about disabilities,
skills are developed that help them interact appropriately, and activities
are provided that influence more positive thoughts and behaviors among
all students. A circle is used as a metaphor to explain the relationship
of individuals in the class. The success of this model is that it
ultimately enables students with disabilities to become an intricate
part of the circle instead of its centerpiece.
Go
Back to Titles
A
Model for the Inclusion of Children with Disabilities
The move toward inclusion, mandated by legislation (Zirkel, 2002)
as well as promoted by professionals and parents, is destined to be
deficient in fulfilling its intended mission if peers are not prepared
to understand, accept, and show respect and concern for their schoolmates
with disabilities. Although many students may support inclusion, they
are often ill prepared for the changes that are associated with this
educational initiative (Smith, Polloway, Patton & Dowdy, 2001).
Inclusion of students with disabilities especially those considered
to be severe, remains one of our most controversial practices in today's
educational settings (Kluth, P., Villa, R. A. & Thousand, J. S.,
2002; Heflin, L. J. & Bullock, L. M., 1999; Simpson, 1995). This
debate continues despite research that corroborates inclusion's benefit
for students with and without disabilities (York, Vandercook, MacDonald,
Heise-Nuff, and Caughney, 1992; Sharpe, York, and Dowdy, 1998; Staub
and Peck, 1995). A number of inclusion efforts have focused on students
with disabilities by preparing them for the environment in which inclusion
is to be implemented. However, Katz and McClellan (1997) suggest that
students with disabilities have had little experience in developing
dyadic relationships with their general classroom classmates. Further,
limited efforts have been made to prepare the inclusion environment
for their non-disabled peers (Hilton and Ringlaben, 1998; Ringlaben
and Dahmen-Jones, 1998). The fact that many students with and without
disabilities are ill prepared for successful inclusion necessitates
the development of a comprehensive model designed for the effective
integration of students (Cooper, M. and Ringlaben, R., 1998; Campbell,
C.R., Campbell, P. and Brady, M.P., 1998).
Educators are struggling to identify the necessary components that
will enable their schools to have a smooth transition from segregating
students with disabilities to serving them appropriately in the general
educational program. One such program is entitled MAPS: A Plan for
Including All Children in Schools. The Kansas State Board of Education
designed this program to encourage family members, general and special
educators, the student with disabilities and friends of the students
to lay the foundation for a spirit of cooperation necessary for true
inclusion. The program allows participants to learn from a variety
of viewpoints through an information sharing time. The MAPS team raises
questions about the student with disabilities' friends, the history;
the aspirations of parents, educators, the relationship among students
with and without disabilities; their needs; and descriptions of an
ideal day at school. Another such program with similar qualities is
called Circle of Friends. This program is also about the development
of people with disabilities and their friends who learn to enrich
the lives of one another.
The programs, MAPS and Circle of Friends, are excellent examples of
strategies designed to increase understanding and empower support
groups to more effectively include those with disabilities. Such programs
are necessary, but not sufficient. A more comprehensive model designed
not only to increase knowledge, but also to affect dispositions (attitudes)
and foster positive feelings must be employed to ensure the success
of inclusion
.
Go
back to Titles
Lilian
Katz (1989) described four components of learning about how children
learn and develop. The four components include knowledge, skills,
dispositions, and feelings. The same components are the basis for
the model for the inclusion of students with disabilities described
on the following pages. Too often, a model of inclusion is more focused
on increasing knowledge and developing skills without the emphasis
on student dispositions and feelings. A more holistic and comprehensive
approach is needed to replace an over dependence on incidental learning,
thus the use of the four components.
Knowledge.
Knowledge includes facts, information, and concepts that teach students
what to do. With the Three Dimensional Model, students learn information
about the student with disabilities. Students attending a general
classroom need to prepare for the inclusion of a student with a disability
by obtaining more knowledge about the disability. For instance, students'
may learn that a classmate with Asperger's syndrome has difficulty
socializing, dominates discussion, continues to adhere to the same
topic during discussions, and in general, communicates poorly. The
students' may learn that a classmate with an attention deficit hyperactive
disorder has difficulty being still, makes decisions without regard
to consequences, and becomes easily distracted.
Skills.
Skills are small units of action or specific behaviors that can be
fairly easily observed and that occur in a relatively short period
of time. While the increase in knowledge teaches students about the
characteristics of classmates with disabilities, the development of
skills teaches students how to communicate and interact more successfully
with their peers with disabilities. In the case of the classmate with
Asperger's syndrome, the students will need to develop skills designed
to facilitate a two-way discussion. Students' knowledge of the characteristics
is necessary, but not sufficient. Students may understand that a classmate
with Asperger's syndrome struggles with effective communication without
knowing how to interact successfully in spite of the understanding.
Likewise, students without disabilities may become aware that a classmate
with Down syndrome may need assistance in completing work through
brief sequential steps. The small units of action or skills learned
by the students are an integral part of the model.
Dispositions.
Dispositions are different from skills and knowledge. Katz (1989)
suggests that dispositions can be thought of as habits of mind, tendencies
to respond to situations in certain ways. While knowledge is about
understanding the characteristics of a disability and skills are about
how to communicate and interact successfully regardless of the disability,
the development of dispositions is more about the explanations for
student behaviors based on their "belief systems. Curiosity,
friendliness, being bossy, bullying, and creativity are examples of
dispositions. There is a difference, for instance, in having reading
skills and having the desire or disposition to read. There is also
a difference in classmates having the skill to communicate with a
student with disabilities and having the will or disposition to communicate
with the classmate. For example, students may develop the skills to
communicate with a classmate who processes information very slowly
or who stutters badly without demonstrating a desire or disposition
to include the classmate during social activities or cooperative learning
activities. A question such as, "What are your thoughts about
peers being separated from the group?" is designed to encourage
students to think more seriously about the inclusion of classmates
alienated because of their differences and/or lack of abilities.
Feelings.
Feelings are subjective emotional states that can be considered both
innate and learned but are based upon an individual's thoughts or
dispositions. Student's self-oriented feelings may include feeling
confident, secure, lonely, competent, inferior, and connected. Student's
other-oriented feelings may include the feeling of concern, compassion,
and empathy toward another classmate or classmates. They may feel
uneasy near a classmate with a particular physical disability, especially
where there may be a loss of limb. However, an emphasis on the knowledge,
skills, and dispositions of the student with the physical disability
can more easily result in a replacement of the uneasiness with more
positive feelings. The students will be more inclined to demonstrate
friendship and caring once the uneasiness diminishes. In this model,
feelings are an integral part of the preparation of students for inclusion.
The positive feelings resulting from the increase in understanding,
the development of skills, and the development of dispositions contribute
to the students' propensity to show caring, especially to classmates'
whose disabilities may alienate and separate them from peers. Through
this emphasis on knowledge building, skill enhancement, and fostering
positive dispositions, students' without disabilities learn more positive
thoughts and feelings about students' with disabilities and become
more inclined to take more positive action.
Katz (1989) gives further insight into how children learn by outlining
ways children acquire knowledge, skills, and dispositions. According
to Katz, knowledge can be acquired from explanations, study, and repetition.
Skills can be learned from instruction, direction, coaching, practice,
and drill. Strategies for teaching dispositions such as curiosity,
empathy, cooperation, risk-taking, friendliness, persistence, and
helpfulness are quite different from increasing knowledge and teaching
skills. Katz suggests that dispositions cannot be learned through
instruction, drill, lectures, or workbooks. She recommends that people
learn dispositions from being around individuals demonstrating the
dispositions, the reinforcement of dispositions once demonstrated,
and the exhortation by others to demonstrate the dispositions.
Go
back to Titles
A
'3-D' Model for Preparing Children for Inclusion
The major focus of this model is to create an environment within
the classroom in which students show caring to those classmates
often alienated and separated from the group. A primary outcome
is the successful inclusion of students' with disabilities who may
be alienated or separated because of their differences or lack of
abilities. Other outcomes include the improvement of the relationship
among all students as well as the realization that regardless of
ability status or personal characteristics students can contribute
to the health and welfare of one another. Attention to the four
components of learning, knowledge, skills, dispositions, and feelings,
are essential to the implementation of this model. The components
are incorporated into a three-phase instructional sequence of activities
beginning with the development of a disposition for caring. Following
this instructional sequence on dispositions, discussions focus on
students' understanding of a particular disability, especially when
the disability contributes to the alienation and separation among
classmates. Students are taught skills for better communicating
and interacting with classmates alienated because of their differences
or lack of abilities. More positive feelings are expected to emerge
among students with and without disabilities following the implementation
of the model activities.
Phase 1-D.
The objective of phase one is to encourage students' dispositions
of friendliness and caring. The development of the disposition toward
friendliness and caring is the cornerstone of the implementation
process. Of course, addressing positive feelings during this instructional
sequence is an integral part of fostering empathic dispositions.
Students can learn knowledge and develop skills more effectively
with feelings of concern and dispositions of caring toward students
with disabilities. Again, consider the example about reading. Students
are more prone to read material that they care about just as they
are more prone to communicate with classmates they care about.
Phase 2-D.
Following the instructional sequence of activities about students'
dispositions and feelings, the students are exposed to activities
designed to help them better understand those differences that tend
to alienate and separate classmates from one another. Salend (1994)
found that attitudes relate to what students' know and have experienced.
Even though it may not always be the case, students with particular
social, mental, and/or physical differences are at risk for alienation.
An increase in knowledge about some classmates' likelihood of alienation
can help alleviate some of this disconnection among peers, especially
when students' have the disposition to care about those who are
alienated.
Phase 3-D.
Skill development becomes the final phase of intervention. It is
likely that many students' lack the skill to interact or communicate
effectively with the classmates who have particular disabilities
prone to alienate or separate them from their peers. Students may
have the disposition to care for classmates alienated and separated
from the group. They may understand the reasons for the alienation
and separation. However, this caring and understanding may not naturally
translate into their ability to effectively communicate and interact.
For instance, many students with particular differences like Aspergers'
syndrome display behaviors that tend to strain relationships and
inhibit effective dialogue. Consequently, students need to learn
skills that facilitate communication.
A Reciprocal Relationship.
During the implementation of the inclusion model, the major thrust
of conversation is often about the support and benefit directed
from students and adults without disabilities to the students with
disabilities. This circle of friends' mentality tends to signify
that students with disabilities are recipients of support and benefit
without reciprocating support and benefit to those without disabilities.
If a circle is used as a metaphor to explain the relational ties
among students with and without disabilities, the students' with
disabilities should be considered as part of the circle rather than
the centerpiece. This reciprocity is an important part of the model
for inclusion since all students are given credit for enriching
the lives of one another.
Go
back to Titles
The
Application of the 3-D Model
The
model developer was requested to prepare students attending a
southeastern Texas school district for the inclusion of students
with disabilities in the general classroom. School administrators
and teachers found many of those students were alienated and separated
from the group. The students had very little sense of belonging.
Over a period of several weeks, group discussions were conducted
with the students, classroom teachers, the school principal, teacher
assistants, and parents. Students were encouraged to embrace and
demonstrate a disposition to care about others, with or without
disabilities. The emphasis on the disposition to care was far
better than telling students to care. By imposing a policy to
include all students in the group, the students would become technicians
of friendship rather than real friends. Once students began developing
their dispositions for caring, their desire to include students
with disabilities would become increasingly evident. Given that
peer influence is a factor in student behaviors, an emphasis was
placed on the disposition of caring among all students. Consequently,
the program prepared the entire class to be more caring and then
introduce the idea about the caring for students alienated, separated,
and isolated from the group. During Phase 1-D, four activities
were presented to affect the students' dispositions. The activities
included discussions about the connection between caring and heroism,
positive and negative peer pressure, a student's need to belong,
and the demonstration of good and bad deeds. Following the four
activities, students began to identify and discuss particular
peers who were alienated and separated from their classroom and
from their school group. This initiated the Phase 2-D of the model
in which students were provided knowledge about other peers with
particular disabilities that tended to alienate and separate them.
Once they better understood the students at risk for alienation,
Phase 3-D commenced with the students being taught skills designed
to develop more effective interactions and communication. It was
during the third phase that the students with and without disabilities
began supporting and benefiting one another more directly.
Phase 1-D/Activity One: Encouraging Heroism Through Caring
The primary focus of this activity was to create the disposition
to care. This was done by introducing the concept, hero, as a
stimulus for the demonstration of caring. Too often, students
limit the term heroes to movie stars, great athletes, and those
who save others' life. While most students dream of being a hero,
very few expect themselves to reach such lofty heights, especially
at such an early age. This activity broadened students' definition
of heroes, and increased the desire among students to demonstrate
heroic acts through caring for one another regardless of differences
that often alienate, separate, and isolate.
At the beginning of the activity, students were asked to define
hero. Typically, students defined hero according to the aforementioned
limitations. When it was suggested that one of the attributes
of a hero is someone who shows caring, students began to express
with enthusiasm examples of heroic demonstrations. Thus, the disposition
to demonstrate caring was clearly introduced and reinforced. As
students began identifying examples of caring, they began to think
about those who lacked the proper care among the student body.
The students began to recognize those schoolmates who needed heroes.
Once this realization emerged, the students' sensitivity for those
alienated and separated from the group became more evident.
Phase 1-D/Activity Two: Encouraging Leadership and Risk-Taking
Through Positive Peer Influence
The primary focus of this activity was to encourage leadership
and risk-taking. Often, students refuse to care because of negative
peer pressure. Many students would exhibit caring more often if
it were not for other classmates who tease, harass, and ridicule.
Weisman (1986) suggested that students would be more inclined
to communicate with students with disabilities except for negative
peer influence. Gleason (1991) concurred by stating that prejudice,
discrimination, and lowered expectations occur when other students
adversely affect their classmates who communicate with students
with disabilities. Subsequently, an activity designed to promote
positive peer pressure and anticipate the negative peer pressure
became important.
At the beginning of this activity, students reviewed and discussed
ways they could demonstrate heroic behavior. They were asked to
identify examples of caring based on their learning from Activity
One. Students were encouraged to imagine and discuss the thoughts
and feelings associated with acts of caring directed toward others
and selves. A discussion followed about the results of such caring
acts. In some instances, students described positive consequences.
In other instances, the students described negative consequences.
For instance, students explained that the demonstration of caring
toward peers have resulted in ridicule and alienation. The students
were encouraged to discuss their thoughts and feelings about this
consequence. Students were encouraged to accept the challenge
to demonstrate caring regardless of being criticized by others.
The disposition of leadership and risk-taking were associated
with this action. This discussion became preparation for future
expectations - to care about others regardless of differences
and/or inabilities. By the conclusion of the second activity,
students begin to express greater concern for classmates and express
a greater propensity to resist those who ridiculed them for caring.
Phase 1-D/Activity Three: Encouraging a Sense of Belonging
Among All Classmates
The primary focus of this activity was to teach the students about
the sense of belonging. The sense of belonging has long been considered
an important and basic need of students (Glasser, 1990; Dreikurs,
1968; and Albert, 1996). Students are more prone to include others
when they recognize belonging as a basic need. They become more
empathic to others once they identify and assume the role of those
being excluded. This identification was encouraged through discussions
and role-play.
At the beginning of the activity, students discussed their needs.
They began with basic needs, such as food, shelter, the sun, air,
and parents. The need to belong or to have friends was not something
considered as a basic need. Once the need to belong was introduced,
the students discussed thoughts and feelings associated with personal
separation, isolation, and alienation from their peer group. The
students also discussed reasons for the separation, alienation,
and lack of belonging. The students explained that the lack of
belonging often occurred as a result of their classmates' differences
and lack of abilities. Following the discussion on the explanations
of alienation and separation among peers, the students discussed
strategies for including classmates. Rather than limiting their
friendship connections, students began to demonstrate new ways
to include those who normally did not belong. This was more easily
accomplished as students learned to resist negative peer pressure,
promote positive peer pressure, and caring as an act of heroism,
discussed in Activities One and Two.
Phase 1-D/ Activity Four: Encouraging Good Deeds
The primary focus of this activity was to encourage students to
demonstrate good deeds and discriminate between good and bad deeds
observed within the school environment. Too often, educators become
preoccupied with antisocial behaviors or bad deeds rather than
focusing more on pro-social behaviors. This is usually because
the bad deeds create the most disruption and gain the most attention.
Consequently, it is the bad deeds that become reinforced while
the pro-social behaviors or good deeds go unnoticed. This particular
activity encouraged students to exercise the dispositions of leadership,
risk-taking, and caring. Teachers were instructed to label the
demonstrations of pro-social behaviors or good deeds and reinforce
appropriate actions.
At the beginning of this activity, students made a list of bad
and good deeds demonstrated toward others. Discussions ensued
about alienating classmates, limiting friendships, excluding classmates
because of their differences or lack of abilities and differences,
and showing too little caring for others. Students were encouraged
to document times when caring occurred among students with and
without disabilities. This documentation reinforced the attention
paid to more appropriate behaviors.
Phase 2-D/Activity Five: Encouraging Understanding of
Specific Differences Among Students
The fifth activity was designed to increase students' understanding
of particular students with disabilities whose differences alienate
and separate them from the group. The discussion revolved around
those schoolmates who lacked a sense of belonging. Once students
develop the disposition to care, they more quickly identify schoolmates
who appear alienated and separated. Typically, the students find
that differences and inabilities tend to alienate and separate
them from their schoolmates. This understanding increases acceptances
among students toward their schoolmates. Examples of differences
that may alienate and separate students include a variety of physical,
social, mental, and emotional disabilities as well as characteristics
such as body type, facial appearance, gait, voice quality, and
the like. Students may have previously questioned the unique physical
characteristics of a child with Down syndrome, the social interactions
of a peer with autism, or the communication skills of an individual
with a hearing impairment. They learn that differences and abilities
do not have to interfere with the development of healthy relationships.
Phase 3-D/Activity Six: Encouraging the Enhancement of
Skills Designed to Increase Effective Relating/Communicating
The sixth activity was designed to develop skills necessary for
successful communication and interaction. Students with and without
disabilities were taught how to relate and communicate effectively
toward one another. There were cases where students with and without
disabilities developed good relationships once the disposition
to care emerged and an understanding about differences and abilities
that alienate and separate students became more apparent. In other
instances, the development of dispositions and the acquisition
of understanding was not enough. In those cases, the students
were taught how to relate and communicative more effectively.
For example, the student with Asperger's syndrome was taught how
to stop and listen by watching for visual cues presented by students
without Asperger's syndrome. The latter students learned a variety
of techniques necessary to foster communication. Likewise, students
who processed information more rapidly learn to slow their pace
for classmates who processed information more slowly. Those techniques
did much to enrich the communication among all students and thus
facilitate acceptance and a sense of belonging.
Conclusions
The
inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education
classroom will continue to be controversial and debatable. This
is especially true for those who treat inclusion as a product
or outcome rather than a process. The "Three Dimensional"
model of inclusion, with it's focus on preparing the students
without disabilities to include their peers with disabilities,
provides a framework designed to give each a better opportunity
to understand and accept one another.
A model for the inclusion of students with disabilities in the
general education classroom should be deliberate and comprehensive.
Time must be spent in preparing students to understand and accept
others through knowledge of differences and similarities, developing
skills needed for caring, and providing activities that aid in
the formation of positive dispositions. We cannot always expect
students to care without guidance. We cannot always expect students
to take the initiative to befriend those alienated and separated
from the group (Hemmeter, M. L., 2000).
However, we can expect students with and without disabilities
to relate and communicate more effectively once they are taught
the disposition to care for those who lack a sense of belonging
among the peer group. This way, students learn to go through the
motion with emotion. The disposition of caring becomes the catalyst
for all students to "reach out" and feel the fact that
some students within the school environment are alienated, separated,
and isolated from the group and that the elimination of alienation
become a most important superordinate goal within the school environment.
References
Albert,
L. (1996). Cooperative discipline, Circle Pines,
MN: American Guidance Services, Inc.
Bauwer, J. and Hourcade, J. (1995). Cooperative
teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all
students. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Campbell, C. R., Campbell, R., and Brady, M.
P. (1998). Building-based decision making: A
shared planning model for inclusive schools.
Educational Considerations, 26(2), 44 - 48.
Cooper, M. J. and Ringlaben, R. (1998). Caring
as an essential element for inclusion. Kappa
Delta Pi Record, 34(2), 56-59.
Dreikurs, R. (1968). Psychology in the classroom.
New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishing.
Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school: Managing
students without coercion. New York, NY: Harper
and Row Publishing.
Gleason, J. J. (1991). Multicultural and exceptional
student education: Separate but equal? Preventing
School Failure, 36(1), 47 - 49.
Heflin, L. & Bullock, L. M. (1999). Inclusion
of students with emotional/behavioral disorders:
A survey of teachers in general and special
education. Preventing School Failure, 43(3),
103 - 111.
Hemmeter, M. L. (2000). Classroom-based interventions:
Evaluating the past and looking toward the future.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
20(1), 56 - 61.
Hilton, A. and Ringlaben, R. (Eds.) (1998).
Best and promising practices in developmental
disabilities, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Katz, L. (1989). Pedagogical issues in early
childhood education. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED321840)
Katz, L. and McClellan. (1997). Fostering children's
social competence: The teacher's role. Washington
D. C.: National Association for the Education
of Young Children.
Kluth, P., Villa, R. A. & Thousand, J. S.
(2002). Our schoold doesn't offer inclusion
and Other legal blunders. Educational Leadership,
59(4), 24 - 27.
Ringlabenm, R. & Dahmen-Jones, D. (1998).
Attitudes and individuals with developmental
disabilities. In A. Hilton & R. Ringlaben
(Eds.) Best and Promising practices in developmental
disabilities. (pp. 295 - 305). Austin, TX Pro-Ed.
Salend, S. J. (1994). Strategies for assessing
attitudes toward individuals with disabilities.
The School Counselor, 41, 338 - 342.
Sharpe, M.N., York, J. L. & Dowdy, C. (1998).
Effects of inclusion on the academic performance
of classmates without disabilities. Remedial
and Special Education,18 (1), 36 - 45.
Simpson, R. L. (1995). Reauthorization of the
individuals with disabilities education act:
Effects on children and youth with autism. Focus
on Autistic Behavior, 10 (5) p16-18.
Smith, T., Polloway, E., Patton, J. & Dowdy,
C. (2001). Teaching students with special Needs
in inclusive settings. Needham Heights, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Staub, D. & Peck, C. A.(1995).. What are
the outcomes for nondisabled students? Educational
Leadership, 52 (4) p36-40.
York, J., Vanderhook, C., MacDonald, D., Heise-Neff,
C., & Caughney, E. (1992).
Feedback about integrating middle school students
with severe disabilities in general education
classes. Exceptional Children, 58, 244 - 258.
Zirkel, P. A. (2002). Decisions that have shaped
U.S. education. Educational Leadership 59(4),
6 - 12.
|